Evaluation and management of clavicle fractures in the juvenile population: a retrospective analysis of 456 patients
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.64575/77szwn90Keywords:
Clavicle fractures, conservative treatment, juvenile, preschool child, pseudoarthrosis, malunionAbstract
Background: Pediatric clavicle fractures in the juvenile population are common injuries that typically heal successfully with nonoperative treatment. Despite this favorable natural history, many centers continue to schedule routine outpatient follow-up visits and obtain repeated radiographs after the initial orthopedic consultation, although the true clinical value of these practices remains uncertain.
Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 456 children aged 3–10 years who presented with clavicle fractures. Fracture location, displacement pattern, periosteal integrity, treatment modality, union status, and radiographic remodeling were recorded, along with demographic variables. The primary outcome measure was any change in clinical management following the initial orthopedic consultation. Patients with polytrauma, pathologic fractures, or those lost to follow-up were excluded; the analysis focused on isolated clavicle fractures in this age group.
Results: The majority of fractures were located at the midshaft (93.0%). Nonoperative management predominated: Velpeau bandages were used in 63.2% of patients and figure-of-eight bandages in 36.4%. Surgical treatment was required in only two patients (0.4%), both due to an increased risk of skin compromise. Complete fracture union was observed in 453 of 456 patients (99.3%); two refractures subsequently achieved union, and one case demonstrated radiographic findings consistent with clavicular pseudoarthrosis. In asymptomatic patients, follow-up visits and repeat radiographs did not lead to any change in management, and no neurovascular complications were identified.
Conclusions: In juvenile patients with isolated and uncomplicated clavicle fractures—including completely displaced patterns—routine clinical follow-up and serial radiographic evaluations after the initial assessment may be unnecessary. A selective follow-up strategy based on clinical findings could reduce radiation exposure and healthcare utilization without compromising patient outcomes.
References
1. Rennie L, Court-Brown CM, Mok JY, Beattie TF. The epidemiology of fractures in children. Injury. 2007;38(8):913-922. doi:10.1016/j.injury.2007.01.036
2. Calder JD, Solan M, Gidwani S, Allen S, Ricketts DM. Management of paediatric clavicle fractures--is follow-up necessary? An audit of 346 cases. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2002;84(5):331-333. doi:10.1308/003588402760452457
3. Strauss BJ, Carey TP, Seabrook JA, Lim R. Pediatric clavicular fractures: assessment of fracture patterns and predictors of complicated outcome. J Emerg Med. 2012;43(1):29-35. doi:10.1016/j.jemermed.2011.06.132
4. Caird MS. Clavicle shaft fractures: are children little adults? J Pediatr Orthop. 2012;32 Suppl 1:S1-S4. doi:10.1097/BPO.0b013e31825870ad
5. Chen W, Zhu Y, Liu S, et al. Demographic and socioeconomic factors influencing the incidence of clavicle fractures, a national population-based survey of five hundred and twelve thousand, one hundred and eighty seven individuals. Int Orthop. 2018;42(3):651-658. doi:10.1007/s00264-018-3815-0
6. Nawar K, Eliya Y, Burrow S, et al. Operative versus non-operative management of mid-diaphyseal clavicle fractures in the skeletally immature population: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2020;13(1):38-49. doi:10.1007/s12178-020-09604-4
7. Kihlström C, Möller M, Lönn K, Wolf O. Clavicle fractures: epidemiology, classification and treatment of 2 422 fractures in the Swedish Fracture Register; an observational study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2017;18(1):82. doi:10.1186/s12891-017-1444-1
8. O'Neill BJ, Hirpara KM, O'Briain D, McGarr C, Kaar TK. Clavicle fractures: a comparison of five classification systems and their relationship to treatment outcomes. Int Orthop. 2011;35(6):909-914. doi:10.1007/s00264-010-1151-0
9. Kocher MS, Waters PM, Micheli LJ. Upper extremity injuries in the paediatric athlete. Sports Med. 2000;30(2):117-135. doi:10.2165/00007256-200030020-00005
10. Neer CS. Fractures of the humeral shaft and shoulder. In: Rockwood CA Jr, Green DP, eds. Fractures in Children. Vol 3. Philadelphia, PA: JB Lippincott; 1996:952-970.
11. Robinson CM, Court-Brown CM, McQueen MM, Wakefield AE. Estimating the risk of nonunion following nonoperative treatment of a clavicular fracture. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004;86(7):1359-1365. doi:10.2106/00004623-200407000-00002
12. Vander Have KL, Perdue AM, Caird MS, Farley FA. Operative versus nonoperative treatment of midshaft clavicle fractures in adolescents. J Pediatr Orthop. 2010;30(4):307-312. doi:10.1097/BPO.0b013e3181db3227
13. O'Neill BJ, Molloy AP, Curtin W. Conservative management of paediatric clavicle fractures. Int J Pediatr. 2011;2011:172571. doi:10.1155/2011/172571
14. Adamich J, Howard A, Camp M. Do all clavicle fractures in children need to be managed by orthopedic surgeons? Pediatr Emerg Care. 2018;34(10):706-710. doi:10.1097/PEC.0000000000001269
15. Ellis HB, Li Y, Bae DS, et al. Descriptive epidemiology of adolescent clavicle fractures: results from the FACTS (Function after Adolescent Clavicle Trauma and Surgery) prospective, multicenter cohort study. Orthop J Sports Med. 2020;8(5):2325967120921344. doi:10.1177/2325967120921344
16. Lenza M, Buchbinder R, Johnston RV, Ferrari BA, Faloppa F. Surgical versus conservative interventions for treating fractures of the middle third of the clavicle. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019;1(1):CD009363. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD009363.pub3
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Mustafa İştahlı (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY-NC) 4.0 License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work’s authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Content on this site is licensed under a 